Your Single Source for Global Tax
TaxSpoc Logo

UAE | CIT

July 21, 2024

UAE: Definition of "Related Parties" under Corporate Tax Law

Public Clarification published by UAE authorities

UAE: Definition of "Related Parties" under Corporate Tax Law

UAE authorities published CIT Public Clarification on “The definition of ‘Related Parties’ where there is a common ownership and/or Control through a Government Entity”.

Issue Defining "Related Parties" in cases of common ownership and/or control through a government entity.

CORPORATE TAX REGULATION IN UAE 

Corporate Tax in the UAE is governed by Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022 on the Taxation of Corporations and Businesses, and its amendments (the "Corporate Tax Law").

ARM’S LENGTH STANDARD REQUIREMENT 

Article 34 of the Corporate Tax Law mandates that transactions and arrangements between related parties must adhere to the arm’s length standard when determining taxable income.

DEFINITION OF RELATED PARTIES 

Article 35 of the Corporate Tax Law defines "Related Parties." Two or more juridical persons can be considered related parties due to common ownership and/or control, whether direct or indirect.

PURPOSE OF CLARIFICATION 

This clarification aims to explain how the definition of "Related Parties" in Article 35 of the Corporate Tax Law applies when common ownership and/or control is through the UAE Federal Government or a Local Government (e.g., Emirate-level government).

SUMMARY 

Common ownership or control by the Federal Government or a Local Government alone does not automatically classify entities as related parties under Article 35 of the Corporate Tax Law.

DETAILED ANALYSIS 

Taxable persons with at least 50% common ownership or control solely through the Federal Government or a Local Government are not considered related parties for the purposes of Article 35.

ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE 

Entities in Group 1 are not considered related parties to entities in Group 2. Therefore, the arm’s length requirement under Article 34 does not apply to transactions between these groups, nor are these transactions subject to transfer pricing documentation requirements.

However, entities within each group are considered related parties. For example:

  • Entity 1, Entity A, and Entity B in Group 1 are related parties to each other.

  • Entity 2, Entity C, and Entity D in Group 2 are related parties to each other but not to entities in Group 1.

A sale between Entity A in Group 1 and Entity D in Group 2 is not a related party transaction. Conversely, a sale between Entity A and Entity B is a related party transaction.

 

SOURCE/RECOMMENDED READ: 

About Authors:

Egypt | VAT

Egyptian Tax Authority (ETA) Rolls Out a Transparent, Hassle-Free VAT System for Global Providers of Digital and Remote Services.

Italy | VAT

Italy Seeks Nearly €1 Billion in VAT payments from Meta, X, and LinkedIn, Targeting Transactions from 2015 to 2022

Egypt | Tax Policy

Fostering Trust, Partnership, and Business Confidence Through Fair and Efficient Tax Services

EU | Customs

The European Commission extends tariff suspension on U.S. imports until April 14, 2025, aiming to resolve trade tensions and avoid escalation

OECD BEPS | Turkey

Amount B will not be applied to transactions involving distributors, sales agents, and brokers operating in Turkey

Saudi Arabia | Big 4

The ban could lead Saudi authorities to implement stricter compliance regulations for consulting firms

EU | Transfer Pricing

MNEs will be required to submit their first top-up tax information return by 30 June 2026, tax authorities will need to exchange this information by 31 December 2026

EU | Tax Policy

Focus on Green Transition, Addressing the VAT gap, and Commitment to Global Tax Reform are some of the priorities

Reach your target audience

Contact us at hello@taxspoc.com

TaxSpoc Logo

Follow Us:

Taxspoc, UAB 2024. The Taxspoc is not responsible for the content of external sites.